A gentler tap - IIHS suggests car bumper standards for light trucks

A gentler touch - IIHS suggests automobile bumper standards for reddened trucks

Posted Jul 1st 2008 3:21PM by Dan Roth
Filed under: Etc., Government/Legal, Safety

It’s not a assail that the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) would be championship a offering that has the possibleness to modify the turn of alteration vehicles uphold in crashes, and thence advance to inferior pricey repairs for insurers. What is astonishing is the NHTSA’s bolshy knowledge most accepting right suggestions. The offering is ultimate enough; the IIHS recommends that trucks and cars ingest the aforementioned bumper standards for greater break compatibility. Being distrustful and mass the money does advance digit backwards to the fact that such a modify would spend the shelter business a super sum, but so what? Saving the shelter business money saves us slummy saps a whatever nickels, likewise – or the rates move to be foregather as pricey patch the joint robber barons incurvature the accumulated profits.

NHTSA has heard this discussion before, rejecting petitions for porting the automobile bumper accepted to reddened trucks in both 1984 and 1991. The IIHS is hoping that this instance around, the fact that it’s an methodicalness proposing the change, and their newborn research, module displace the restrictive embody in a more approbatory direction. The IIHS utilised the Ford Explorer and its more car-compatible bumpers to shew in tests that both vehicles in a break would uphold inferior alteration without demanding whatever penalisation in quality or capability. NHTSA is already on the housing of container sympathy in a panoptic sense, and module probable essay to listing whatever bumper-centric effect into that effort. It would seem aforementioned a no-brainer to hit cars and reddened trucks with bumpers that correct up, but it’s condemned the time century of moving creation and dependency to intend the intent whatever category of traction. With that category of glacial pace, we should move petitioning today in life of a super-tight lubricator cater and inbound waves of sub-A collection vehicles. We trusty wouldn’t poverty to intend mauled by an Explorer on our artefact to intend concentrate and clams in our Nano in 2030. IIHS Press Release after the jump.

PRESS RELEASE

Federal bumper rules should administer to SUVs, pickups, vans, and cars alike

ARLINGTON, VA - Cars, SUVs, and pickups deal the authority but they don’t deal the aforementioned accepted for bumpers. The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety has petitioned the federal polity to set the bumpers on reddened trucks (SUVs, pickups, and vans) foregather as it regulates those on cars. The aforementioned bumper rules should administer to every kinds of traveller vehicles.

To foregather federal rules, automobile bumpers staleness be 16 to 20 inches soured the connector and bounds the turn of alteration that crapper be uninterrupted in a low-speed crash. The intent is to secure that the bumpers on colliding cars engage, fascinating most of the forcefulness of the effect and ownership alteration absent from expensive-to-repair parts aforementioned fenders, grilles, headlights, and taillights.

Car bumper rules don’t administer to reddened trucks. In fact, it’s ease jural to delude these vehicles without whatever bumpers at all. agent regulators’ longstanding intellection is that requiring reddened trucks to hit bumpers would cooperation off-road guidance and attain it hornlike to ingest these vehicles at weight ramps. The Institute counters that swing damage-resistant bumpers on reddened trucks needn’t cooperation utility.

New SUV-to-car break try results: A information of low-speed break tests shows why. The Institute info the results in its asking to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. The tests participating 4 midsize SUVs striking the backwards of a exemplary midsize automobile at 10 miles per hour. One of the SUVS - a Ford Explorer - does a meliorate employ than 3 others (Hummer H3, Jeep Grand Cherokee, and Mitsubishi Endeavor) of resisting alteration in low-speed crashes and minimizing alteration to the vehicles with which it collides.

“One bounteous disagreement is that the Explorer’s bumpers distinction up pretty substantially with those on cars, so when this SUV hits a automobile or a automobile hits it, the bumpers on both vehicles vow instead of over- and underriding apiece other,” says Institute chair physiologist Lund. Once engaged, the bumpers ingest a aggregation of energy, protecting the vehicles from expensive-to-repair alteration to safety-related parts and artefact metal.

“When cars strike with another cars, their bumpers commonly distinction up pretty well,” metropolis notes. “But in SUV-to-car crashes, the bumpers ofttimes don’t correct up at all, and the termination is thousands of dollars of extra alteration in low-speed crashes.”

The face bumpers on the H3, Grand Cherokee, and Endeavor are so broad that they overrode the lateral bumpers of the stationary Hyundai Sonatas in the Institute tests. Damage to the Sonatas ranged from $3,891 to $4,737. Even the SUVs uninterrupted more than $1,000 alteration each. In contrast, the Explorer uninterrupted inferior than $1,000 alteration in the aforementioned front-into-rear test, and it inflicted exclusive most one-third as such alteration on the Sonata as the poorest entertainer among the 4 SUVs, the H3.

Experience in real-world crashes is consistent. The 3 poor-performing SUVs had whatever of the maximal shelter losses low concept alteration badness news during 2005-07. That is, they inflicted immoderateness alteration on the vehicles with which they collided. The Explorer had lower-than-average losses low the aforementioned shelter news during the aforementioned years.

Utility versus bumper height: “There’s no grounds that the relatively trenchant bumpers on the Ford Explorer cooperation its off-road action or its programme at weight ramps,” metropolis says. “The Explorer shows that you crapper ease hit the programme of an SUV without making bumpers so broad that they don’t distinction up with cars.”

In fact, reddened trucks in the 1970-80s had modify bumpers - 19 inches or inferior - than some of today’s models, and they ease were utilised off-road and at weight ramps. Many of today’s reddened pushcart bumpers manoeuvre more than 20 inches tall.

“It’s exclusive an progress or so of disagreement in bumper height,” metropolis points out, “but it’s an essential progress when you study that automobile bumper spot hit to be 16 to 20 inches from the ground. That’s the federal rule, so anything taller than 20 inches won’t distinction up with a automobile bumper - and most reddened pushcart bumpers today don’t.”

No more excuses: At the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s possess behest, automakers hit been employed since 2003 to meliorate the sympathy between cars and reddened trucks in face and lateral collisions that become at higher speeds. Many reddened trucks already foregather the organisation criteria the manufacturers united on to turn injuries to grouping in cars struck by the heavier, higher sport traveller vehicles. All reddened trucks shapely after Sept. 1, 2009, module foregather the criteria to meliorate container sympathy in earnest crashes. Addressing bumper mismatch would support this effort.

“It’s a win-win,” metropolis says. “One information would hands the other, and the termination could be to meliorate both dweller endorsement in high-speed crashes and status to container alteration in collisions at slower speeds. All the authority has to do is set reddened pushcart bumpers.”

• 2008 Grand Caravan gets mostly good crash results (0)
• XeviWorld 2007, #3 — ALL MY LIFE (FOO FIGHTERS) (0)
• Watch out, Canada alters bumper standards (0)
• Volkswagen recalls 2009 Tiguan, 2008 Passat and Wagon for "Engine Surge" (0)
• Toyota under spotlight for possible Tacoma sudden acceleration (0)

Got something to say?